Mr Jamil Khan & Mr Michael Jones (instructed by Fiona Bruce Solicitors) for the Appellant.
successful appellant in the Court of Appeal in the case of C :
Those of our readers who are interested in issues of appeals , Jamil Khan and Michael Jones represented the successful appellant in the Court of Appeal in the case of C :
Mr Jamil Khan & Mr Michael Jones (instructed by Fiona Bruce Solicitors) for the Appellant.
Re C (Children)
Case No: B4/2016/0456
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
7 April 2016
 EWCA Civ 356
2016 WL 01253986
Before: Lady Justice Black and Lord Justice Floyd
Date: Thursday 7th April 2016
On Appeal from Warrington County Court and Family Court
His Honour Judge Parker
Hearing dates: 25th February 2016
Mr Jamil Khan & Mr Michael Jones (instructed by Fiona Bruce Solicitors) for the Appellant.
Mr Neil Christian (instructed by Warrington Borough Council ) for the 1st Respondent.
Miss Audrey Van De Haer (instructed by HCB Widdows ) for the 2nd Respondent.
Damian Sanders (instructed by Canter, Levin & Berg ) for the 3rd Respondent.
Lady Justice Black:
1 This appeal by the mother of two children (E who is 4 years old and K who is 3 years old) is against orders made by His Honour Judge Parker on 11, 14 and 27 January 2016. At the conclusion of the appeal hearing, in order that the parties could make progress with the case in the Family Court, we announced that the appeal was allowed for reasons which would be given later. This judgment sets out my reasons.
2 Judge Parker was himself engaged upon an appeal against orders made by lay justices sitting in the Family Court in care proceedings. The local authority had sought care orders in relation to E and K, as recommended by the social worker, the guardian, and a psychologist who had assessed the children's mother. However, having heard the mother giving evidence for over three hours, the justices concluded that she had made material changes in her life and acknowledged past problems, and they differed from the recommendation of the professional witnesses. Accordingly, on 29 October 2015, they made supervision orders which, absent the local authority's appeal to Judge Parker, would have resulted in the children returning to the care of the mother. The local authority, however, appealed contending that there had been serious procedural irregularities and that the decision of the justices was wrong for a number of reasons.
3 The case was listed before Judge Parker for four days, starting on 11 January 2016. As recorded in his case management order of 25 November 2015, the plan was that the first two days would be devoted to hearing the appeal and, if the appeal were to be allowed and a
re-hearing ordered, the final two days would be used for the re-hearing.
Order of 11 January 2016
4 At the outset of the case on 11 January 2016, the judge made a further case management direction, namely that the mother would give oral evidence at the appeal hearing. This was an unusual course and the judge gave a short judgment on 11 January explaining why he had adopted it.
5 In preparation for the appeal hearing, a transcript of the evidence of several of the witnesses at the care hearing had been sought, including that of the mother. The judge considered the transcript of the mother's evidence “woefully inadequate”. There were many references to her evidence being inaudible and, in the judge's view, this rendered the transcript “incoherent”. He thought it was “of insufficient quality for the court to perform a proper assessment of the mother's evidence”. This concerned him because he thought it would disable him from carrying out what he saw as a necessary part of his function on the appeal. The judge's concern and his reasoning for the solution he adopted appear from the following passages in his case management judgment:
“5. ..... This court, the appellate court, is .... being asked to express its judgment on whether the magistrates were wrong based upon an inadequate transcript of the mother's evidence, setting that against the findings of the magistrates and also, of course, the written evidence and transcripts presently held of the psychologist and also the written evidence of the social worker and, I anticipate, the written evidence and transcript of evidence of the children's guardian.
6. My real concern about approaching the case in that way is that the mother is prejudiced. How can it be in the mother's best interests, when that part of the evidence that was the basis for reliance within the judgment of the magistrates, namely the mother's evidence before them – the single most important piece in the jigsaw for the magistrates, looking at their written reasons – that the appeal proceeds without a coherent account of what the mother said, that appears to have been so persuasive for the magistrates that they felt able to reject the evidence of the three experts? Of course, in my judgment, the answer to that is that it cannot be in the mother's best interests. She has to have the option of restating her case in a coherent way before the appellate court such that her case can be put as well and as strongly as it can be put. If the opposite view was taken by this court then the court would be left considering an incoherent account of the mother's evidence set against coherent accounts of all those witnesses who gave evidence that was the antithesis of the mother's case. Fairness, in my judgment, demands in this case that the mother has the opportunity to put that evidence again before me.”
6 In so deciding, the judge recognised that ordinarily appeals are dealt with by way of review but he seems to have seen the process that he instigated as a re-hearing, within the provisions of Rule 30.12 of the Family Procedure Rules 2010 .
The appeal hearing and the order of 14 January 2016
7 The mother duly gave evidence orally to Judge Parker and he set out what she said, and his impressions of her, starting at §36 of his judgment of 14 January 2016. At §60, he came to ask himself whether, “based on the available evidence .... the magistrates were right to find that the mother was in a different place to February 2015” when the children had come into foster care. He accepted that she had resolved some of her problems, but concluded that there was insufficient evidence of material change and that there was a high risk of a relapse, which could not be managed by a supervision order. He determined that, for a number of reasons which he set out, the justices had been wrong to reach the conclusion that they did. He concluded his judgment in this way:
“In those circumstances, the appeal is allowed and the matter will now be listed for
re-hearing on 8 February.”
8 The order of 14 January 2016 provided, inter alia, for the appeal to be allowed, for the matter to be listed for “re-hearing/Final Hearing” on 8 February with the social worker, the mother and the guardian as witnesses, and for updated evidence to be filed by the mother, the local authority and the guardian for that hearing.
The next hearing and the order of 27 January 2016
9 At a further directions hearing on 27 January 2016, counsel for the mother renewed an application he had first made at the conclusion of the appeal hearing for Judge Parker to recuse himself, essentially on the basis that he had made findings about the mother at the appeal hearing which were unnecessary for the appeal and had the effect of rendering the scheduled re-hearing otiose. The judge refused that application, explaining that he considered that it had been unavoidable to make findings about the mother's evidence and that, in his view, those findings did not render a re-hearing otiose because it was still necessary to decide between the care and placement orders sought by the local authority and the mother's proposal of placement at home in the context of a care order. He drew an analogy with findings of fact hearings, where the judge finding the facts almost always goes on to deal with the final disposal of the care and placement application, and indeed should do so to keep proper continuity, as he thought should happen here. He said that the findings could be revisited if there had been a change. His view was that in any event, even if he recused himself, the findings he had made at the appeal hearing would be carried forward to the new judge and “would stand because they were not appealed successfully” (§6 27 January judgment).
10 A second application was made on behalf of the mother, namely for an independent social worker to be instructed to prepare a report. The judge rejected that application on the basis that there was no hole in the evidence that needed filling by such a report and the process would cause delay which would be very prejudicial to the children.
The mother's appeal to this court and the positions of the other parties
11 The mother argued that the procedure followed by the judge was fundamentally flawed. The appeal hearing went awry, in her submission, by virtue of the judge hearing oral evidence from her and forming his own conclusions about her when his focus should have been upon the justices' assessment with a view to determining whether they had gone wrong. He thus went outside the remit of an appellate judge. The problem was compounded, in her submission, by the fact that the findings made at the appeal hearing on the basis of only part of the evidence predetermined the re-hearing which the judge ordered to follow and which could not therefore be a fair hearing. She submitted that, furthermore, the judge himself could not properly go on to hear the scheduled re-hearing; he should have arranged for it to be in front of another judge, who should not have sight of the findings made in the appeal process. Given the passage of time, the court would need an up to date analysis of the situation for the re-hearing and, the mother submitted, the judge should have recognised that in the particular circumstances of the case it was necessary to have an independent social work report.
12 The mother was supported by the father in the appeal. Despite the fact they are now separated, they both want the mother to resume care of the children. The local authority opposed the appeal, seeking to uphold the decisions of Judge Parker.
13 The guardian's position was slightly more complex. She supported the appeal but in part only. The flaw that she identified in the appeal process was that the judge had, in effect, conducted a re-hearing prior to adjudicating upon the appeal in the normal way. He was correct to hear evidence from the mother, in the guardian's submission, but should not have heard evidence from her which went beyond that given to the justices and should not have determined issues that “could be viewed as final issues” which would have to be considered at the re-hearing. It was put in this way in the guardian's counsel's skeleton argument:
“....something about the fact that oral evidence was heard, and that findings were made
on that evidence, rendered the re-hearing of the final hearing by the same court unfair, or at the very least gave the appearance of being unfair.”
Accordingly, the judge was wrong, in the guardian's submission, not to recuse himself as requested. However, the guardian argued that the judge was not wrong to allow the appeal and that the proper course now would be to remit the care case for an expedited re-hearing before another circuit judge. The question of another expert should be considered at a directions hearing in preparation for that re-hearing, she submitted.
14 In setting out my conclusions about the appeal, I propose to say as little as possible about the facts of the case and the conclusions of the justices because, by our order at the end of the appeal hearing before us, we remitted the local authority's appeal to the Family Court for re-hearing. I would not like anything I say to influence or undermine that process. This is particularly so as we did not hear argument about the substance of the local authority's appeal, the concentration being rather upon the process adopted by Judge Parker. Fortunately, it is not necessary to go into the details in order to explain why I formed the view that I did of matters.
15 The provisions of Rule 30.12 of the Family Procedure Rules 2010 which governed the appeal to Judge Parker in this case are almost identical to the provisions of Rule 52.11 of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 which govern a large number of other types of appeal, including those to the Court of Appeal. Both rules provide that “[e]very appeal will be limited to a review of the decision of the lower court” unless different provision is made elsewhere for a particular category of appeal or (the provision upon which Judge Parker relied) “the court considers that in the circumstances of an individual appeal it would be in the interests of justice to hold a re-hearing”. As for oral evidence, the default provision, set out in Rule 30.12(2) and Rule 52.11(2) , is that it will not be received and, although the power to permit it does exist, in practice it is very rare indeed for there to be oral evidence on appeals.
16 In the vast majority of cases, no question of an appeal taking the form of a re-hearing even arises, the general rule that appeals are limited to a review of the decision of the lower court simply being observed as a matter of course. Counsel for the appellant mother cited a passage from In re B (A Child) (Care Proceedings: Threshold Criteria)  UKSC 33,  1 W.L.R. 1911 which underlined how rare it is for an appeal to be dealt with by way of a re-hearing and identified the attributes of the exceptional cases in which this occurs. Although, in this passage, Lord Neuberger was focussing particularly on the role of the appeal court when considering the proportionality of an order made by the first instance court, I see no reason why his comments should be confined to that situation:
“86. .....There is, in my view, no reason why the Court of Appeal in a case such as this should not have followed the normal, almost invariable, approach of an appellate court in the United Kingdom on a first appeal, namely that of reviewing the trial judge's conclusion on the issue, rather than that of reconsidering the issue afresh for itself.
87. That this is the normal function of the Court of Appeal is made clear by CPR 52.11 , which states that, save in exceptional cases, every appeal is limited to a review rather than a re-hearing and the appeal will be allowed only where the decision of the lower court was ‘wrong’ or ‘unjust because of a serious procedural or other irregularity in the proceedings in the lower court’. The ‘exceptional cases' are, as a matter of principle and experience, almost always limited to those where the Court of Appeal (i) decides that the judge has gone wrong in some way so that his decision cannot stand, and (ii) feels able to reconsider, or ‘rehear’, the issue for itself rather than incurring the parties in the cost and delay of a fresh hearing at first instance.”
17 If the question does arise as to whether it would be in the interests of justice to hold a re-hearing, the court will look to see whether there are any special features which support a departure from what is overwhelmingly the normal course. In so doing, it seems to me that the court has to keep firmly in mind the limits of its proper role as an appeal court. The authorities are peppered with reminders that an appeal court should be reluctant to interfere with the
assessment of credibility and the findings of fact made by a trial judge who has seen the parties and the other witnesses. For present purposes, I alight upon what Lord Wilson had to say on the subject in In re B (A Child) (supra), where he dealt also with the approach that should be taken by an appellate court to a decision of a family judge about a child's future:
“41. Into its review of a trial judge's determination of a child case an appellate court needs to factor the advantages which the judge had over it in appraising the case. In Piglowska v Piglowski  1 WLR 1360 , 1372 Lord Hoffmann said:
“The appellate court must bear in mind the advantage which the first instance judge had in seeing the parties and the other witnesses. This is well understood on questions of credibility and findings of primary fact. But it goes further than that. It applies also to the judge's evaluation of those facts. If I may quote what I said in Biogen Inc v Medeva plc  RPC 1 , 45: ‘The need for appellate caution in reversing the trial judge's evaluation of the facts is based on much more solid grounds than professional courtesy. It is because specific findings of fact, even by the most meticulous judge, are inherently an incomplete statement of the impression which was made on him by the primary evidence. His expressed findings are always surrounded by a penumbra of imprecision as to emphasis, relative weight, minor qualification and nuance ... of which time and language do not permit exact expression, but which may play an important part in the judge's overall evaluation.’”
42. Lord Hoffmann's remarks apply all the more strongly to an appeal against a decision about the future of a child. In the Biogen case the issue was whether the subject of a claim to a patent was obvious and so did not amount to a patentable invention. Resolution of the issue required no regard to the future. The Piglowska case concerned financial remedies following divorce and the issue related to the weight which the district judge had given to the respective needs of the parties for accommodation. In his assessment of such needs there was no doubt an element of regard to the future. But it would have been as nothing in comparison with the need for a judge in a child case to look to the future. The function of the family judge in a child case transcends the need to decide issues of fact; and so his (or her) advantage over the appellate court transcends the conventional advantage of the fact-finder who has seen and heard the witnesses of fact. In a child case the judge develops a face-to-face, bench-to-witness-box, acquaintanceship with each of the candidates for the care of the child. Throughout their evidence his function is to ask himself not just “is this true?” or “is this sincere?” but “what does this evidence tell me about any future parenting of the child by this witness?” and, in a public law case, when always hoping to be able to answer his question negatively, to ask “are the local authority's concerns about the future parenting of the child by this witness justified?” The function demands a high degree of wisdom on the part of the family judge; focussed training; and the allowance to him by the justice system of time to reflect and to choose the optimum expression of the reasons for his decision. But the corollary is the difficulty of mounting a successful appeal against a judge's decision about the future arrangements for a child.”
18 In the present case, it was the justices who had the advantages of the trial judge, and Judge Parker, as the appeal court, was bound to approach their decision with the respect described by Lord Wilson. When deciding what to do about the inadequacies in the transcript, he should have asked himself what part the transcript could legitimately play in the appeal process, bearing this in mind. As his role was not to attempt to reassess the mother's evidence himself at second hand, on the basis of the transcript, with a view to determining whether the justices' reliance upon her had been misplaced, did he actually need a complete transcript of her evidence?
19 In order to answer this question, Judge Parker needed to consider how the local authority proposed to put its case before him. There can be appeals where a detailed study of what a witness said is required. However, nothing in the argument that this local authority sought to advance to the judge by way of appeal turned on any particular passages in the transcript of the mother's evidence. It was not their case that the justices had mistaken or failed to give weight to particular things that the mother said in the course of her evidence and, if I recollect correctly
what was said to us in submissions, the local authority had not in fact sought a transcript of any of the evidence themselves; the idea came from the judge. The thrust of their appeal was that the justices had failed to evaluate the mother's evidence having proper regard to the history of the case and the other evidence, including that of the guardian, the social worker and the psychologist, and that their conclusion that her evidence established that there had been real change in the situation which had caused problems for the children in the past was untenable. An appeal on grounds such as this would normally be advanced by means of submissions drawing attention to aspects of the evidence which demonstrated the flaws in the justices' conclusions and to deficiencies in their written reasoning. It is by no means always necessary to have a transcript of the evidence in the court below for this purpose and especially where the argument does not turn on precise words used by the witnesses in the course of oral evidence. However, if the judge thought that he needed better information about what the mother said than emerged from the imperfect transcript here, he should have explored alternatives methods of obtaining it, rather than simply embarking upon re-hearing her evidence. The transcript provided a good framework, even if deficient in some details, and notes of evidence taken by counsel who appeared before the justices might well have filled in the gaps sufficiently, for example.
20 This was not, in my view, one of those exceptional appeal cases in which a re-hearing was required in the interests of justice. Indeed, as things turned out, the process disadvantaged the mother. By directing at the outset of the appeal that she would give evidence again in front of him, it seems to me that, albeit for the very best of reasons, Judge Parker inadvertently deprived her of the opportunity to attempt to persuade him that the favourable determination of the justices should be respected, recognising their advantages as the tribunal which had heard all the evidence, and reached conclusions in the light of it. Given the nature of the local authority's appeal arguments, there was no need for him to have proceeded in this way and it was inappropriate for him to have done so.
21 It was submitted to us that the process before the judge was confused, having elements of both a re-hearing and an appeal. I agree with that submission. The confusion is demonstrated not only in the hearing itself but in the directions that the judge gave afterwards which provided for a further re-hearing in front of him, with his adverse findings about the mother carried forward to that re-hearing. The whole process undermined the mother's position, despite the judge's intention that it should assist her. The favourable findings of the justices, reached following a hearing at which oral evidence was given by all of the key witnesses, were dislodged in favour of adverse findings made by the judge, who had heard only from the mother. In fairness to the judge, it should be recognised that the mother's counsel did not seek to put questions to the other witnesses. He explained to us that, having unsuccessfully resisted the judge's proposed course of hearing oral evidence from the mother, he understandably did not consider that it would be appropriate to appear in this way to be agreeing to the process that the judge had imposed, and nor did he consider that cross-examination would assist. However it came about though, it was not fair to the mother for the adverse findings made at a partial re-hearing of this kind to be carried forward into the next re-hearing.
22 So, for the reasons I have set out, I concluded that the process adopted by Judge Parker on the local authority's appeal to him was not appropriate or fair to the mother, even though he embarked upon it with the best of intentions. The proper course was therefore to set aside all the orders that he had made in connection with the local authority's appeal and to return the matter to the Family Court for that appeal to be determined afresh. Although, at the hearing before us, it was contemplated that directions would be given by the Family Division Liaison Judge for the Northern Circuit with a view to the local authority's appeal being listed, it was subsequently arranged that Judge de Haas would take charge of the directions instead. It is not necessary, or desirable, to say more on the question of the mother's application for a further report on the situation to be commissioned from an independent social worker. This is more properly the province of the judge dealing with the continuing proceedings at first instance.
Lord Justice Floyd:
23 The judge considered that it would be unjust to the mother to hear the local authority's appeal without hearing the mother's evidence afresh, because of the absence of a full transcript of her evidence given to the justices. He said that the transcript was “of insufficient quality for the court to perform a proper assessment of the mother's evidence”. That was his reason for departing from the general rule that “every appeal will be limited to a review of the decision of the lower court...”. In Asiansky Television plc and another v Bayer-Rosin (a firm)  EWCA Civ 1792 ,
Dyson LJ (as he then was) explained, in the context of CPR 52.11(2) , what was necessary before it is in “the interests of justice to hold a re-hearing”:
“80. There must, however, be some feature of the case that unusually makes it unjust for the appeal to be limited to one of review. The fact that the appellant wishes to rely on evidence that was not before the lower court is not often likely by itself to be a sufficient reason for holding a rehearing rather than a review. That is because the power given by CPR r.52.11(2) to receive such evidence is exercisable whether the appeal is by way of rehearing or review.
82. But there may be cases where it is difficult or impossible to decide an appeal justly without a rehearing; for example, if the judgment of the lower court is so inadequately reasoned that it is not possible for the appeal court to determine the appeal justly without a rehearing; or if there was a serious procedural irregularity in the court below so that, for example, the appellant was prevented from developing his case properly. But where the decision of the lower court is adequately reasoned and there has been no such procedural irregularity, it should usually be possible for the appeal court to determine the appeal by review and not rehearing.”
24 No party in the present case was contending that it could not adequately present its case on the appeal if it were to be conducted by way of a review, or that the court could not decide the case justly by the normal process of review. No party was contending that the absence of a perfected transcript of the mother's evidence meant that a re-hearing was required. In my judgment, the judge's opinion that it would be unjust to the mother to hear the appeal without such a transcript was not justified. It was founded on his belief that it was part of his function to form an overall assessment of the mother's evidence. However, in the circumstances of this appeal, where the mother had already given her oral evidence over a period of three hours to the justices, it did not follow that a minute examination of the transcript would be either necessary or appropriate.
25 Appeals are frequently, and fairly, conducted without the benefit of any transcript of the evidence at all. In the present case, no party was relying on the detail of what the mother had said to the justices in evidence. The local authority was contending that the justices had given insufficient weight to the evidence of the professionals. The mother was relying, and entitled to rely, on the impression which her oral evidence had made on the justices, the findings which the justices had made in reliance on it, and the justices' evaluative assessment of her parental abilities. The judge's decision to hold a re-hearing of the mother's evidence and substitute his own findings of fact about her allowed him to short-circuit all these points, to the disadvantage of the mother. It was not in her interests, or in the interests of justice generally, that he should do so.
26 It is for those reasons, and the reasons more fully expressed by Black LJ with which I am in complete agreement, that I concluded that this appeal had to be allowed. It followed that the order which she has referred to had to be made.
Teenager accused of murdering stabbing victim James Halewood appears in court
There were tears in the public gallery from supporters of the alleged killer
Day by day, all the evidence the jury heard in the Yousef Makki murder trial
It was a trial featuring detailed and, at times, shocking evidence that began on June 16
Teenager cleared of murdering grammar school friend with flick knife
A teenager has been cleared of the murder of his grammar schoolboy friend with a flick knife.
School boy stabbed to death ‘by friend’ as they ‘played middle class gangsters’
Yousef Makki, died after being stabbed with a flick knife in Cheshire
Liverpool care worker ‘used plastic bag to divert patient’s mind’
A care worker accused of putting a plastic bag over a 79-year-old patient's head told a court he he wanted to "divert her mind".
Yousef Makki: Teenager denies ‘red mist’ led to stabbing death
A teenager on trial for murder has been accused of stabbing his school friend in the heart after "red mist" descended.
Yousef Makki murder trial: Boy denies murder of MGS student
The 17-year-old Manchester Grammar School pupil was stabbed in the chest in Hale Barns
Boy, 17, denies ‘red mist’ took over before he stabbed friend in heart
A teenager accused of stabbing his friend to death said he doesn’t know how his knife pierced the boy’s heart.
Boy accused of murdering pupil Yousef Makki was a knife-obsessed ‘wannabe hardman’, court told
Yousef, 17, died after he was knifed through the heart on Gorse Bank Road in Hale Barns during the evening of March 2 this year
Yousef Makki: ‘Wannabe hard man’ stabbed school friend, court hears
A teenager accused of murdering his friend is a "wannabe hard man" who is "obsessed" with knives, a jury heard.
Dad-of-three brutally beaten to death by cocaine addict desperate for drugs
"We've been robbed of our dad. He will not be involved in our futures.
Three mates, one dead and two in the dock - what we learned in the Yousef Makki murder trial.
The trial of two teenagers has heard how the Manchester Grammar School pupil died, despite desperate efforts to save him.
Extra jail term for ATM raider
A CRIMINAL jailed for his involvement in a daring ATM ram raid plot has received another prison term, for handling stolen goods
Carer accused of putting plastic bag over pensioner’s head ‘said he was playing peekaboo’
Santosh Bhatta denies placing the bag over the head of vulnerable Olinda Mansfield, 79.
Worker’s face is being rebuilt after she was scalped from her eyebrows to the back of her head
when her hair was caught in machinery at timber factory fined £466,000 for safety breaches
Woman’s face rebuilt by doctors after scalp ripped off in gruesome factory accident
The 29-year-old's hair became caught in a machine which damaged her ears and the top of her skull
Jailed this Week: Gun minders, hapless drug dealers and a depraved paedophile
Liverpool Crown Court has heard the conclusion of some shocking cases this week.
Yousef Makki, 17, was ‘stabbed by his friend’ in Hale Burns, Cheshire on March 2
Two 17-year-old boys have gone on trial in Manchester over the alleged murder
Fatal stabbing of pupil followed botched attempt to rob drug dealer, court hears
Yousef Makki, 17, was a pupil at the prestigious Manchester Grammar School. Photo:
Boy, 17, died after being ‘stabbed in heart by friend when robbery attempt went wrong’
A grammar school pupil was stabbed in the heart by his teenage friend after a botched attempt to rob a drug dealer of £45.
Schoolboy fatally stabbed by friend after bungled drug deal, court hears
Alleged killer of Yousef Makki, 17, denies murder and charge of conspiracy to robbery
‘KNIFED IN THE HEART’ Private schoolboy, 17,
A TALENTED private schoolboy was knifed to death by his rich friend during a fight over a £45 drugs heist gone wrong.
Yousef Makki death: Pupil stabbed ‘after botched drug robbery’
A grammar school pupil was stabbed in the heart by his teenage friend after a botched attempt to rob a drug dealer a court heard
Murder trial over death of teenager shot in head on bike collapses
James Meadows' family stormed out in disgust after weeks of delays
Terrifying ‘assassin’s kit’ found in manbag to be used for gangland drugs turf war
"You made those firearms available for use to maim, kill, intimidate and terrorise others"
Drug dealer promises to ‘go straight’ for baby son after being jailed
"To quote Humphrey Bogart, 'when you lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas'"
Shotgun death trial jury hear final arguments from prosecution and defence
Peter Colwell died when a shotgun went off in the back of a Land Rover
Injury by cricket ball
Chances to make safe shotgun that killed teen were missed, jury hears
Failure to do so cost a teenager his, a trial heard today
‘Bullying’ carer devoured dinner intended for dementia sufferer while hungry victim watched
Suspicious colleague found remains of food washed down sink U-bend
Carer jailed after eating pensioner’s meals leaving her to starve
Joan Barnett jailed for 10 months for 'cruel and heartless' treatment of pensioner
Woman caught drink-driving for 3rd time claims she was traumatised by death of Coupar Angus boy
Lynda Berwick said she had been left disturbed by being a witness to the tragic death of Kane Morris, 10, in the flat above her
Doorman turned gangster film actor tried to save cannabis plants as his home burned
Bennett admitted being concerned in the production of cannabis and possessing the Class B drug with intent to supply.
Man who called himself a paedophile hunter was actually a paedophile himself
Court heard details of horrific child abuse photographs collected by 32-year-old, who was spared jail
Woman who witnessed death of child caught drink driving
Lynda Berwick overheard the tragic death of
Dad carrying child suffers broken neck after being hit by firework at “DIY” display
The brave dad miraculously managed to pass his daughter on before collapsing
Father and firm in court after scaffolder fell to death through factory roof
A father received a suspended sentence after his 26-year-old son fell to his death through a factory’s fragile roof.
7 Harrington street Chambers Margaret Parr led in a case before the Court of Appeal
Chambers Congratulate Miss Janet Reaney on her appointment to Circuit Bench
Hancock v Promontoria Pine Designated Activity Company (2019)
(Liverpool County Court, Business and Property)
29-year-old woman dragged 40 metres to her death by driver who walked free from court
Christine Hannah carried on for another six metres after not realising Kirsty Upton was under her car
Grandmother of teen shot in head on motorbike thought he’d been in a crash
Court hears James Meadows' family, doctors and police were confused when he came off a bike in Huyton
Killers smile and give middle finger to murdered teen’s family in court
Brandon Regan, 17, was stabbed to death over a stolen scooter leaving his relatives in "unbearable" pain
Three men on trial accused of murder of Huyton teenager James Meadows: updates
The teenager was shot in the head while riding as a passenger on a motorbike just weeks before his 18th birthday
Smirking killer shows finger to Brandon Regan’s family in court - sentencing updates
Two men were found guilty of murder and one was found guilty of manslaughter
CCTV played in court shows Brandon Regan less than an hour before his brutal murder
Two men have been convicted of murder and one of manslaughter over Brandon's death
Drug dealer who stabbed teen to death over stolen scooter found guilty of murder
Steven Jones and Lewis Gibbons convicted of murdering Brandon Regan as Jack Butterworth found guilty of manslaughter
Evil thug battered six stone victim to death - then tried to blame ‘drinking buddy’
Ronald Culshaw was jailed for life for a brutal attack on much-loved and 'carefree soul' Ian Conning
Drug dealer who stabbed teen to death ‘no angel’ but not a murderer, jury told
Defence lawyers say Steven Jones knifed Brandon Regan four times in 'self-defence'
Life sentences for two found guilty of murdering Birkenhead woman Glenda Jackson
TWO brothers have been jailed for life this afternoon for the murder of popular Wirral woman Glenda Jackson.
Self defence claims of Brandon Regan murder suspect do not even ‘get out of the blocks’, jurors told
Prosecutor Nigel Power, QC, says stabbing of teen followed 'assault on standing' of Steven Jones
Pupillage Applications Now Open- Pupillage Commencing September 2019
Alleged murderer ‘doesn’t know’ how his DNA got on axe and meat cleaver
Three men are accused of the murder of Brandon Regan who was stabbed to death in Speke
Chambers Congratulate Katherine O’Donohue on her Appointment as Deputy District Judge
Chambers Congratulate Katherine O'Donohue on her Appointment as Deputy District Judge
“Passionate” LFC fan stole £12,000 from disabled supporters to feed gambling habit
"Despicable and selfish" Philip Lea has voluntarily banned himself from the game for two years
Teen on scooter ‘run off road and then knifed four times’
Brandon Regan's rib was severed when a knife was thrust in his back with severe force
Driver who ‘ran murdered teen off road’ tried to sell car afterwards
Brandon Regan was allegedly hit by a black Audi A4 while fleeing on a stolen scooter, then stabbed to death
Richard Pratt QC and Jamil Khan in the High Court Family Division for 15 weeks
Three men accused of murdering teenager Brandon Regan who was found dead in garden - trial updates
A fourth man has been cleared of murdering the 17-year-old fatally knifed in Speke
James Lockett inquest: Cause of death ‘impossible to tell’
A man found dead in his flat was so badly decomposed it was "impossible" to establish a cause of death, a coroner has said.
Man grins at detectives after being cleared of murdering stabbed teen
Prosecutors offered no further evidence against one of four people on trial over Brandon Regan's death.
Boy stabbed to death ‘chased by man wielding butcher’s knife’
Brandon Regan murder trial hears man shouted: 'Carry on running - I'm just going to go to your mum's'
Video shows boy stabbed to death buying slushy and riding bike before he was killed
A witness says a man in a car following Brandon Regan shouted "I'm going to f***ing kill you"
Boy stabbed to death after ‘stealing scooter’ was found dead in back garden
The stolen vehicle's owner allegedly told Brandon Regan's friend: "We got your boy"
Four men accused of murdering teenager found dead in garden Brandon Regan - trial updates
The 17-year-old was fatally knifed in Critchley Road on January 28 last year
‘The best thing in our life has been taken away’ murdered teen’s mum on the heartbreak of losing son
Eddie was just 18 years old when he was brutally stabbed to death after a feud over a girl
Mum makes heartbreaking plea after son stabbed to death in dispute over girl
Eddie O'Rourke's killers were found guilty earlier this week, and his mum has said the family have been 'left in turmoil'
“Eddie was not only my son but my best friend”- Mum pays tribute after killers found guilty
THE mother of 18-year-old Eddie O'Rourke who was killed at a birthday party in Runcorn last year has paid tribute.
Friend of two brothers charged with murder denies he attacked Glenda Jackson ‘with kicks and stamps’
James Lunt was drinking with the brothers the night Glenda Jackson died, and appeared in court as a witness
Worker exposed to Sellafield plutonium had skin removed
Sellafield has been ordered to pay almost £500,000 after a worker was exposed to eight times the annual limit of plutonium.
Woman stabbed to death hours after telling police she was victim of homophobic attack
Nicholas Curtis says he acted in self-defence after being stabbed by Glenda Jackson
‘Bully’ Nelson drug dealer tortured ‘vulnerable’ man to death.
A drug dealer who tortured and killed a "vulnerable" man in a "depraved" attack has been jailed for life.
Verdict due in Atif Muhmood ‘torture murder’ trial
Jurors at Preston Crown Court have heard how Mr Moore dealt drugs for Muhmood to feed his own habit.
Partygoer, 18, was ‘stabbed to death with a 12-inch “Pirates of the Caribbean” knife.
Two boys, 17 and 15, are accused of his murder but have both pleaded not guilty
Runcorn stab death: Teenagers deny ‘Pirates’ knife murder
An 18-year-old was stabbed to death with a "Pirates of the Caribbean" knife in a row with another teenager over a girl.
Teens face charge of murdering Runcorn 18-year-old Eddie O’Rourke - updates
Two boys aged 15 and 17, who cannot be named for legal reasons, both deny the charge of murder
Shocking moment gas blast devastates town in ‘insurance scam’
Nigel Lawrence QC, prosecuting, accused Blasio of deliberately causing the blast that injured 81 people.
Sean Cox: Man jailed for Liverpool fan assault
A man who left a Liverpool fan in a coma in an attack outside the club's Anfield stadium has been jailed.
Telford brothers behind bars after police chase and string of burglaries
Two Telford brothers have been put behind bars for nearly nine years for a string of burglaries.
How car salesman lived the high-life by skimming £400k from his company
Paul Owens stole swish Mazdas and Mercedes to fund Caribbean holidays and expensive jewellery
Blake Brown’s “professional execution” compared to “wild west” by senior barrister
Defendant Lee Blowes accused of being a "switch on criminal" who was "in the thick of it"
Wirral gas explosion jury fail to reach verdict
Pascal Blasio was charged with causing a gas blast at the Homes In Style shop in New Ferry, Wirral, in 2017
‘Wealthy’ teenage drug dealer caught with ecstasy at Y-Not festival
Harrison Tudor-Jackson told security officers a bump they could feel in his trousers was his private parts
Man whose failing business blew up says he has “no idea” who turned the gas on
Pascal Blasio ran a furniture shop on Bebington Road which was on the verge of financial collapse, his trial is told
Inquest told of family worries about ambulance response time
The family of a woman from the Welsh border who died last year, fear an ambulance delay may have played a part in her death.
Chambers Welcome Simon Holder
We are hiring!
New Ferry gas explosion was ‘insurance job gone wrong’
An "apocalyptic" explosion that injured 81 people and caused "utter devastation" was an insurance job that went badly wrong,
Man stabbed his mum to death and tried to kill gran’s carer in psychotic episode
Christian Lacey today admitted the manslaughter of Liz Lacey and attempted murder of Edwina Holden
Chambers Congratulate Fiaz Siddique on Tenancy
Thieving police officer cleared over indecent images of children
A FORMER Greater Manchester policeman, who stole electronic items seized during investigations, was jailed for 12 months
Man murdered his own dad by stabbing him NINETEEN times
Graham Renshaw had called police on his son a month before the murder, telling them he was armed with a knife
Son accused of stabbing his Ellesmere Port father to death while he slept on the couch
AN ELLESMERE Port man aged 52 was stabbed to death by his son in an unprovoked frenzied attack as he lay asleep on a settee.
Mr Jamil Khan & Mr Michael Jones (instructed by Fiona Bruce Solicitors) for the Appellant.
successful appellant in the Court of Appeal in the case of C :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FAMILY DIVISION
MR J KHAN and Ms F TURNER for the Second Respondent
Property developer Nigel Russell cleared of sending threatening email to Liverpool City Council
Louise Connelly failed to disclose her criminal past to the council when required to do so
Three men accused of murdering Huyton teen James Meadows set to stand trial
The 17-year-old was shot in the head while riding as a passenger on a motorbike
REBECCA FERGUSON HELPS LAUNCH BRAND NEW CHILDREN’S CHARITY FOR LIVERPOOL
The new charity is chaired by Iain Goldrein QC
Boy, 15, killed man with knife after ‘drinking for six days’
The teenager, who cannot be named for legal reasons, has been found guilty of manslaughter
Boy, 15, accused of Macclesfield murder claims he acted in self defence
Ian Schofield, 37, was fatally stabbed in May this year